oracle查询dictionary,Oracle的DICTIONARYDICT视图。

admin 管理员组

文章数量: 1086949

oracle查询dictionary,Oracle的DICTIONARY/DICT视图。

The Dictionary in the Data Dictionary

Today’s journey takes on

a trip into Oracle’s data dictionary, specifically, the dictionary

part or aspect of it. It’s interesting and informative to take a

peak under the covers and see how Oracle, (the product, that is),

is put together. Aside from trying to reverse engineer things,

looking at the underlying components presents an “If Oracle did it

this way, maybe I can too” learning paradigm. For example,

normalization is a huge part of database design, so it’s fair to

ask (or look, in this case) how well the SYS tables are normalized.

Much, and practically all for that matter, of what you query from

or against in the data dictionary is based on views, and as we all

know, views are usually based on tables. What is in those tables

and how does it all fit together?

DICTIONARY and

DICT

The DICTIONARY view contains metadata about other data

dictionary items. Most people familiar with Oracle’s data

dictionary will say that the data dictionary is based entirely on

views on tables owned by SYS. Well, yes, but to be more precise

(using the DICTIONARY “view” in this case), that’s not entirely

correct. Instead of being a view, to you as a member of PUBLIC,

DICTIONARY from your perspective is a synonym. This synonym points

to the SYS-owned view named DICTIONARY, and by the order in which

Oracle resolves an object name, a

public synonym is evaluated before a table or view. If you were to

query against SYS.DICTIONARY, you would be accessing the view named

DICTIONARY owned by SYS.

Closely related to DICTIONARY is a public synonym named DICT.

This synonym is nothing more than a shortcut name for DICTIONARY.

Can you think of another shortcut name of a view in the data

dictionary? The TAB synonym is a pointer to part of what is in the

DBA/ALL/USER_TABLES views. So DICT or DICTIONARY, either one

suffices as both ultimately are derived from several SYS-owned

tables.

The columns of DICTIONARY are table_name and comments. In Oracle

10g R2, there are 659 records, of which, interestingly enough, 91

have no comments. What good is a dictionary without words? Almost

all table name-only records are from the DBA/ALL/USER family (just

an observation, no real reason why they’re from this category).

Where do the comments come from? This is where we start looking

at the underlying tables. The source code behind this view can be

found in the catalog.sql script. The top part of the create view

statement is shown below.

remark

remark VIEW "DICTIONARY"

remark Online documentation for data dictionary tables and views.

remark This view exists outside of the family schema.

remark

create or replace view DICTIONARY

(TABLE_NAME, COMMENTS)

as

select o.name, c.comment$

from sys.obj$ o, sys.com$ c

where o.obj# = c.obj#(+)

and c.col# is null

and o.owner# = 0

and o.type# = 4

...continues...

The OBJ$ table (owned by SYS) is like the uber table of the data

dictionary. Every object has an ID number, an owner number, and a

type number (among other attributes). If OBJ# were a primary key,

we would expect to see primary key type of information about that

column. As it turns out, OBJ# is not the primary key per a “this

column is defined to the primary key for this table.” What does a

primary key have in terms of other constraints? OBJ# does have a

unique index and a not null check constraint, so that must be close

enough from Oracle’s perspective.

The OBJ$ table also has another interesting index related

characteristic, and that is the index named I_OBJ2. This index uses

six columns, which is fairly rare in terms of the number of columns

involved. The vast majority of indexes I see are limited to one,

two or three columns, with the exception of some data warehouse

indexes with five or six columns. All of the objects users create

must be registered in this table, so this is a table that will

continue to grow. How and when are statistics created for the

table? That depends on the version of Oracle you’re using. From

older to newer, the advice or guidance has ranged from “don’t do

it” to “have at it.”

The difference between TYPE# and OWNER# is that the object types

are known ahead of time. Oracle only has so many types, so that

information is static, whereas owners (aside from the internal or

fixed type users of Oracle) come and go. With this difference in

mind, we’d expect to see a lookup table that relates a textual name

versus an owner number. The USER$ table serves this function.

Is there a lookup table for types? We see what the types are in

object tables (the object_type column), but internally, at least as

far as the label versus ID number, Oracle does not have this. So

where does the type name come from? The DECODE of type as seen in

the view creation statements for the _OBJECTS views is what

produces the text labels we see.

Going back to the question posed earlier about where the

comments come from, we can see that a table name COM$ is referenced

in the create dictionary view statement. The COM$ table consists of

OBJ#, COL# and a COMMENT$ columns. In a higher level normalized

form, we’d expect to see a table with OBJ#, COL# and a comment

number or ID, along with a table that then matches the comment

number versus text string or description.

The screenshot below shows how Oracle (at least this table, but

there are others like it) did not go to third normal form. How many

places does a string like “A date function used to compute the

NEXT_DATE” occur? Another string, “Name of the object,” appears 85

times. Doesn’t that clearly violate what every book on database

design and normalization talks about?

Hacking the Data Dictionary

Perhaps you’d be interested in hacking the data dictionary and

adding your own comments into the COM$ table. I wouldn’t recommend

doing that (who would?), so if you wanted to fill in the missing

comments, it would be better to create another view that used a

support table to supply that information (and add your own). If you

were going to do it (using DUAL as an example), find the object

number for DUAL and then use that value for the insert into the

COM$ table.

SQL> select obj#, owner#, name

from obj$ where name = 'DUAL';

OBJ# OWNER# NAME

---------- ---------- ------

258 0 DUAL

259 1 DUAL

9635 24 DUAL

9857 25 DUAL

40433 34 DUAL

40682 35 DUAL

41037 36 DUAL

41990 38 DUAL

42756 43 DUAL

45858 46 DUAL

47876 47 DUAL

50711 51 DUAL

52789 54 DUAL

54234 55 DUAL

52511 56 DUAL

54804 63 DUAL

16 rows selected.

Note that the DUAL table appears more than once, so be sure to

tag the one owned by SYS (the owner number for SYS is zero). When

inserting into the COM$ table, don’t include a COL#. The statement

that creates the DICTIONARY view matches on where the COL# number

is null. The “@dict” script (mine) just selects from DICTIONARY

where the table name is equal to what was entered.

SQL> insert into com$ (obj#,comment$)

values (258,'This the dual table');

1 row created.

SQL> @dict

Enter value for table: dual

TABLE_NAME COMMENTS

------------------------------ --------------------

DUAL This the dual table

The views with missing comments are relatively unimportant, so

performing this hack using existing objects is certainly not

essential. As for adding new lines to the DICTIONARY view via

inserts into the COM$ table, as long as you’re using existing

object numbers, you’re probably safe. Keep track of what you’ve

inserted because if the data dictionary were to be rebuilt, your

work is likely to get overwritten/deleted.

In Closing

Overall, it looks like the data dictionary, specifically, the

SYS schema, is a lot like schemas you encounter in the workplace,

that is, some objects were created “following the rules,” and some

were not. Are queries against the data dictionary faster because

there aren’t lookup tables? Or, is the lack of a lookup table for

comments more of a convenience for the engineers who work on the

SYS schema tables? Regardless, at least now you can reverse

engineer how the dictionary was put together.

本文标签： oracle查询dictionary Oracle的DICTIONARYDICT视图