admin 管理员组文章数量: 1086019
2024年4月12日发(作者:郑州市发布)
English is a Crazy Language
by Richard Lederer
English is the most widely spoken language in the history of our planet, used in
some way by at least one out of every seven human beings around the globe. Half of
the world's books are written in English, and the majority of international telephone
calls are made in English. Sixty percent of the world's radio programs are beamed in
English, and more than seventy percent of international mail is written and addressed
in English. Eighty percent of all computer texts, including all web sites, are stored in
English.
English has acquired the largest vocabulary of all the world's languages, perhaps
as many as two million words, and has generated one of the noblest bodies of
literature in the annals of the human race. Nonetheless, it is now time to face the fact
that English is a crazy language -- the most loopy and wiggy of all tongues.
In what other language do people drive in a parkway and park in a driveway?
In what other language do people play at a recital and recite at a play?
Why does night fall but never break and day break but never fall?
Why is it that when we transport something by car, it's called a
shipment
, but when
we transport something by ship, it's called
cargo
?
Why does a man get a
her
nia and a woman a
hys
terectomy?
Why do we pack suits in a garment bag and garments in a suitcase?
Why do privates eat in the general mess and generals eat in the private mess?
Why do we call it
newsprint
when it contains no printing but when we put print on
it, we call it a
newspaper
?
Why are people who ride motorcycles called
bikers
and people who ride bikes
called
cyclists
?
Why -- in our crazy language -- can your nose run and your feet smell?
Language is like the air we breathe. It's invisible, inescapable, indispensable, and
we take it for granted. But, when we take the time to step back and listen to the
sounds that escape from the holes in people's faces and to explore the paradoxes and
vagaries of English, we find that hot dogs can be cold, darkrooms can be lit, homework
can be done in school, nightmares can take place in broad daylight while morning
sickness and daydreaming can take place at night, tomboys are girls and midwives can
be men, hours -- especially happy hours and rush hours -- often last longer than sixty
minutes, quicksand works
very
slowly, boxing rings are square, silverware and glasses
can be made of plastic and tablecloths of paper, most telephones are dialed by being
punched (or pushed?), and most bathrooms don't have any baths in them. In fact, a
dog can go to the bathroom under a tree -- no bath, no room; it's still going to the
bathroom. And doesn't it seem a little bizarre that we go to the bathroom in order to
go to the bathroom?
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man
can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a
kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom? How did all those Renaissance men
reproduce when there don't seem to have been any Renaissance women?
Sometimes you have to believe that all English speakers should be committed to
an asylum for the verbally insane:
In what other language do they call the third hand on the clock the second hand?
Why do they call them
apartments
when they're all together?
Why do we call them
buildings
, when they're already built?
Why it is called a
TV set
when you get only one?
Why is
phonetic
not spelled phonetically?
Why is it so hard to remember how to spell
mnemonic
?
Why doesn't
onomatopoeia
sound like what it is?
Why is the word
abbreviation
so long?
Why is
diminutive
so undiminutive?
Why does the word
monosyllabic
consist of five syllables?
Why is there no synonym for
synonym
or
thesaurus
?
And why, pray tell, does
lisp
have an s in it?
English is crazy.
If adults commit adultery, do infants commit infantry? If olive oil is made from
olives, what do they make baby oil from? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a
humanitarian consume? If
pro
and
con
are opposites, is
congress
the opposite of
progress
?
Why can you call a woman a mouse but not a rat -- a kitten but not a cat? Why is
it that a woman can be a vision, but not a sight -- unless your eyes hurt? Then she can
be "a sight for sore eyes."
A writer is someone who writes, and a stinger is something that stings. But
fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce, hammers don't ham, humdingers don't
humding, ushers don't ush, and haberdashers do not haberdash.
If the plural of
tooth
is
teeth
, shouldn't the plural of
booth
be
beeth
? One goose,
two geese -- so one moose, two meese? One index, two indices -- one Kleenex, two
Kleenices? If people ring a bell today and rang a bell yesterday, why don't we say that
they flang a ball? If they wrote a letter, perhaps they also bote their tongue. If the
teacher taught, why isn't it also true that the preacher praught? Why is it that the sun
shone yesterday while I shined my shoes, that I treaded water and then trod on the
beach, and that I flew out to see a World Series game in which my favorite player flied
out?
If we conceive a conception and receive at a reception, why don't we grieve a
greption and believe a beleption? If a firefighter fights fire, what does a freedom
fighter fight? If a horsehair mat is made from the hair of horses, from what is a mohair
coat made?
A
slim chance
and a
fat chance
are the same, as are a
caregiver
and a
caretaker
, a
bad licking
and a
good licking
, and "What's going on?" and "What's coming off?" But
a
wise man
and a
wise guy
are opposites. How can
sharp speech
and
blunt speech
be
the same and
quite a lot
and
quite a few
the same, while
overlook
and
oversee
are
opposites? How can the weather be
hot as hell
one day and
cold as hell
the next?
If
button
and
unbutton
and
tie
and
untie
are opposites, why are
loosen
and
unloosen
and
ravel
and
unravel
the same? If
bad
is the opposite of
good
,
hard
the
opposite of
soft
, and
up
the opposite of
down
, why are
badly
and
goodly
,
hardly
and
softly
, and
upright
and
downright
not opposing pairs? If harmless actions are the
opposite of harmful actions, why are shameful and shameless behavior the same and
pricey objects less expensive than priceless ones? If appropriate and inappropriate
remarks and passable and impassable mountain trails are opposites, why are
flammable and inflammable materials, heritable and inheritable property, and passive
and impassive people the same? How can valuable objects be less valuable than
invaluable ones? If
uplift
is the same as
lift up
, why are
upset
and
set up
opposite in
meaning? Why are
pertinent
and
impertinent
,
canny
and
uncanny
, and
famous
and
infamous
neither opposites nor the same? How can
raise
and
raze
and
reckless
and
wreckless
be opposites when each pair contains the same sound?
Why is it that when the sun or the moon or the stars are out, they are visible, but
when the lights are out, they are invisible; that when I clip a coupon from a newspaper
I separate it, but when I clip a coupon to a newspaper, I fasten it; and that when I wind
up my watch, I start it, but when I wind up this essay, I shall end it?
English is a crazy language.
How can expressions like "I'm mad about my flat," "No football coaches allowed,"
"I'll come by in the morning and knock you up," and "Keep your pecker up" convey
such different messages in two countries that purport to speak the same English?
How can it be easier to assent than to dissent but harder to ascend than to
descend? Why is it that a man with hair on his head has more hair than a man with
hairs on his head; that if you decide to be bad forever, you choose to be bad for good;
and that if you choose to wear only your left shoe, then your left one is right and your
right one is left? Right?
Small wonder that we English users are constantly standing meaning on its
head. Let's look at a number of familiar English words and phrases that turn out to
mean the opposite or something very different from what we think they mean:
A waiter. Why do they call those food servers
waiters
, when it's the customers
who do the waiting?
I could care less.
I couldn't care less
is the clearer, more accurate version. Why do
so many people delete the negative from this statement? Because they are afraid that
the
less
combination will make a double negative, which is a no-no.
I really miss not seeing you. Whenever people say this to me, I feel like
responding, "All right, I'll leave!" Here speakers throw in a gratuitous negative, not,
even though
I really miss seeing you
is what they want to say.
The movie kept me literally glued to my seat. The chances of our buttocks being
literally epoxied to a seat are about as small as the chances of our literally rolling in the
aisles while watching a funny movie or literally drowning in tears while watching a sad
one. We actually mean
The movie kept me figuratively glued to my seat
-- but who
needs
figuratively
, anyway?
A non-stop flight. Never get on one of these. You'll never get down.
A near miss.
A near miss
is, in reality, a collision. A close call is actually
a near hit
.
My idea fell between the cracks. If something
fell between the cracks
, didn't it
land smack on the planks or the concrete? Shouldn't that be
my idea fell into the
cracks
(or
between the boards
)?
A hot water heater. Who heats hot water? This is similar to garbage
disposal. Actually, the stuff isn't garbage until after you dispose of it.
A hot cup of coffee. Here again the English language gets us in hot water. Who
cares if the cup is hot? Surely we mean
a cup of hot coffee.
Doughnut holes. Aren't those little treats really
doughnut balls
? The holes are
what's left in the original doughnut. (And if a candy cane is shaped like a cane, why
isn't a doughnut shaped like a nut?)
I want to have my cake and eat it too. Shouldn't this timeworn cliché be
I want
to eat my cake and have it too
? Isn't the logical sequence that one hopes to eat the
cake and then still possess it?
A one-night stand. So who's standing? Similarly, to sleep with someone. Who's
sleeping?
I'll follow you to the ends of the earth. Let the word go out to the four corners
of the earth that ever since Columbus we have known that the earth doesn't have any
ends.
It's neither here nor there. Then where is it?
Extraordinary. If
extra-fine
means "even finer than fine" and
extra-large
"even
larger than large," why doesn't
extraordinary
mean "even more ordinary than
ordinary"?
The first century B.C. These hundred years occurred much longer ago than
people imagined. What we call
the first century B.C.
was, in fact
the last century B.C.
Daylight saving time. Not a single second of daylight is saved by this ploy.
The announcement was made by a nameless official. Just about everyone has a
name, even officials. Surely what is meant is "The announcement was made by an
unnamed official."
Preplan, preboard, preheat, and prerecord. Aren't people who do this simply
planning, boarding, heating, and recording? Who needs the pretentious prefix? I have
even seen shows "prerecorded before a live audience," certainly preferable to
prerecording before a dead audience.
Pull up a chair. We don't really pull a chair up; we pull it along the ground. We
don't pick up the phone; we pick up the receiver. And we don't really throw up; we
throw out.
Put on your shoes and socks. This is an exceedingly difficult maneuver. Most of
us put on our socks first, then our shoes.
A hit-and-run play. If you know your baseball, you know that the sequence
constitutes "a run-and-hit play."
The bus goes back and forth between the terminal and the airport. Again we
find mass confusion about the order of events. You have to go forth before you can go
back.
I got caught in one of the biggest traffic bottlenecks of the year. The bigger
the bottleneck, the more freely the contents of the bottle flow through it. To be true to
the metaphor, we should say,
I got caught in one of the smallest traffic bottlenecks of
the year
.
Underwater and underground. Things that we claim are
underwater
and
underground
are obviously surrounded by, not under the water and ground.
I lucked out.
To luck out
sounds as if you're out of luck. Don't you mean
I lucked
in
?
Because we speakers and writers of English seem to have our heads screwed on
backwards, we constantly misperceive our bodies, often saying just the opposite of
what we mean:
Watch your head. I keep seeing this sign on low doorways, but I haven't figured
out how to follow the instructions. Trying to watch your head is like trying to bite your
teeth.
They're head over heels in love. That's nice, but all of us do almost everything
head over heels
. If we are trying to create an image of people doing cartwheels and
somersaults, why don't we say,
They're heels over head in love
?
Put your best foot forward. Now let' We have a good foot and a better
foot -- but we don't have a third -- and best -- foot. It's our better foot we want to put
forward. This grammar atrocity is akin to May the best team win. Usually there are
only two teams in the contest. Similarly, in any list of bestsellers, only the most
popular book is genuinely a bestseller. All the rest are bettersellers.
Keep a stiff upper lip. When we are disappointed or afraid, which lip do we try to
control? The lower lip, of course, is the one we are trying to keep from quivering.
I'm speaking tongue in cheek. So how can anyone understand you?
Skinny. If
fatty
means "full of fat," shouldn't
skinny
mean "full of skin"?
They do things behind my back. You want they should do things in front of your
back?
They did it ass backwards. What's wrong with that? We do
everything
ass
backwards.
English is weird.
In the rigid expressions that wear tonal grooves in the record of our language,
beck
can appear only with
call
,
cranny
with
nook
,
hue
with
cry
,
main
with
might
,
fettle
only with
fine
,
aback
with
taken
,
caboodle
with
kit
, and
spick
and
span
only with each
other. Why must all shrifts be short, all lucre filthy, all bystanders innocent, and all
bedfellows strange? I'm convinced that some shrifts are lengthy and that some lucre is
squeaky clean, and I've certainly met guilty bystanders and perfectly normal bedfellows.
Why is it that only swoops are fell? Sure, the verbivorous William Shakespeare
invented the expression "one fell swoop," but why can't strokes, swings, acts, and the
like also be fell? Why are we allowed to vent our spleens but never our kidneys or
livers? Why must it be only our minds that are boggled and never our eyes or our
hearts? Why can't eyes and jars be ajar, as well as doors? Why must aspersions always
be cast and never hurled or lobbed?
Doesn't it seem just a little wifty that we can make amends but never just one
amend; that no matter how carefully we comb through the annals of history, we can
never discover just one annal; that we can never pull a shenanigan, be in a doldrum,
eat an egg Benedict, or get just one jitter, a willy, a delirium tremen, or a heebie-
jeebie. Why, sifting through the wreckage of a disaster, can we never find just one
smithereen?
Indeed, this whole business of plurals that don't have matching singulars reminds
me to ask this burning question, one that has puzzled scholars for decades: If you have
a bunch of odds and ends and you get rid of or sell off all but one of them, what do
you call that doohickey with which you're left?
What do you make of the fact that we can talk about certain things and ideas only
when they are absent? Once they appear, our blessed English doesn't allow us to
describe them. Have you ever seen a horseful carriage or a strapful gown? Have you
ever run into someone who was combobulated, sheveled, gruntled, chalant, plussed,
ruly, gainly, maculate, pecunious, or peccable? Have you ever met a sung hero or
experienced requited love? I know people who are no spring chickens, but where, pray
tell,
are
the people who are spring chickens? Where are the people who actually would
hurt a fly? All the time I meet people who
are
great shakes, who
can
cut the mustard,
who
can
fight City Hall, who
are
my cup of tea, who
would
lift a finger to help, who
would
give you the time of day, and whom I
would
touch with a ten-foot pole, but I
can't talk about them in English -- and that
is
a laughing matter.
If the truth be told, all languages are a little crazy. As Walt Whitman might
proclaim, they contradict themselves. That's because language is invented, not
discovered, by boys and girls and men and women, not computers. As such, language
reflects the creative and fearful asymmetry of the human race, which, of course, isn't
really a race at all.
That's why we wear a pair of pants but, except on very cold days, not a pair of
shirts. That's why men wear a bathing suit and bathing trunks at the same time. That's
why
brassiere
is singular but
panties
is plural. That's why there's a team in Toronto
called the
Maple Leafs
and another in Minnesota called the
Timberwolves
.
That's why
six
,
seven
,
eight
, and
nine
change to
sixty
,
seventy
,
eighty
, and
ninety
,
but
two
,
three
,
four
, and
five
do not become
twoty
,
threety
,
fourty
, and
fivety
. That's
why first-degree murder is more serious than third-degree murder but a third-degree
burn is more serious than a first-degree burn. That's why we can open up the floor,
climb the walls, raise the roof, pick up the house, and bring down the house.
In his essay "The Awful German Language," Mark Twain spoofs the confusion
engendered by German gender by translating literally from a conversation in a German
Sunday school book: "
Gretchen
. Wilhelm, where is the turnip?
Wilhelm
. She has gone
to the kitchen.
Gretchen
. Where is the accomplished and beautiful English
maiden?
Wilhelm
. It has gone to the opera." Twain continues: "A tree is male, its buds
are female, its leaves are neuter; horses are sexless, dogs are male, cats are female --
tomcats included."
Still, you have to marvel at the unique lunacy of the English language, in which
you can turn a light on and you can turn a light off and you can turn a light out, but
you can't turn a light in; in which the sun comes up and goes down, but prices go up
and come down -- a gloriously wiggy tongue in which your house can simultaneously
burn up and burn down and your car can slow up and slow down, in which you fill in a
form by filling out a form, in which your alarm clock goes off by going on, in which you
are inoculated for measles by being inoculated against measles, in which you add up a
column of figures by adding them down, and in which you first chop a tree down --
and then you chop it up.
版权声明:本文标题:English is a Crazy Language英语:疯狂的语言 内容由网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:http://www.roclinux.cn/p/1712890547a611101.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论